<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Technology Bytes</title>
      <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/</link>
      <description>Technology articles from Marcel Brown Technology Services</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:13:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>August 2008 FYI - Windows Crash of Olympic Proportions!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="olympic_small.jpg" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/olympic_small.jpg" width="235" height="160" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>Lenovo, the official technology provider of the 2008 Olympics, rejected the use of Windows Vista for any of  the 12,000 vital PCs used for the operation of the games, opting instead to use Windows XP. Quoting the chairman of Lenovo, "If it's not stable, it could have some problems". However, in a spectacular display of instability, a Windows XP computer operating part of the light show for the opening ceremonies suffered a "Blue Screen of Death", which is slang for a total Windows system crash, projecting the super-sized error screen onto part of the stadium. Read more about this Olympic snafu <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5035456/blue-screen-of-death-strikes-birds-nest-during-opening-ceremonies-torch-lighting">here</a>. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/08/august_2008_fyi_windows_crash.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/08/august_2008_fyi_windows_crash.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FYI</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:13:23 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Tech Toy of the Month - Sprint AIRAVE</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="airave.jpg" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/airave.jpg" width="100" height="127" class="mt-image-left" style="float: left; margin: 0 20px 20px 0;" /></span>A lot of cellular users are frustrated by the lack of a strong signal inside certain buildings. This can be especially frustrating when that building is your own home or office. There have been solutions available to boost the signal strength inside a building, but none as technically interesting as this month's Tech Toy. The <a href="http://www.sprintenterprise.com/airave/">Sprint AIRAVE</a> may be the first of a trend of devices to marry two important technologies - cellular phones and Internet service.</p>

<p>Currently only available on the Sprint network, the $100 AIRAVE is basically a mini cell phone tower that you can place in your home or office. Unlike other signal boosting technologies which simply retransmit the signal from a nearby cell tower, the AIRAVE uses your broadband Internet service to connect to Sprint's network. By doing so, users who are in extremely poor coverage areas can still receive strong signals. This is because the signal boosting is not dependent on nearby towers since the AIRAVE is relaying calls directly to Sprint's network via the user's Internet connection.</p>

<p>Another potential advantage of the AIRAVE is that Sprint does not charge airtime minutes while a user is connected to the device. Instead, Sprint charges a flat rate of $5 - $10 per month depending on the user's current plan for unlimited use of the AIRAVE. If a user uses a lot of cell minutes while located in a particular building, this can be advantageous. On the flip side, if a user is frustrated by the lack of coverage in a building, paying another $5 - $10 month to improve their coverage may not seem like a good deal. Some reports on the Internet state that Sprint may be offering the AIRAVE free of charge to customers with poor coverage, but of course, take these reports with a large grain of salt.</p>

<p>Another potential issue with the AIRAVE is with the requirement for a broadband Internet connection. Many areas that lack good cell coverage also lack broadband Internet! Many users in remote locations do have satellite Internet service, but it is not likely that the AIRAVE will work well with satellite Internet services. While satellite services can provide good bandwidth, they have high latency which will probably not work well with a cell phone call. So the AIRAVE probably won't be a good solution for users in remote areas. </p>

<p>If the AIRAVE does well, expect other wireless providers to follow up with devices of their own. These devices could become extremely popular, as it allows wireless providers to let users solve their own coverage issues fairly easily. In theory, this can save the wireless companies money since they may not need to deploy as many cell towers.</p>

<p>Contact <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">Marcel</a> for any questions you may have regarding the latest technology gadgets!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/08/tech_toy_of_the_month_sprint_a.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/08/tech_toy_of_the_month_sprint_a.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tech Toys</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:00:24 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Q: Should I buy a laptop or desktop?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Tech Q & A" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/Question%20Mark.JPG" width="100" height="91" ALIGN=LEFT HSPACE=10 VSPACE=5/><br />
<em>- Submitted by many<br />
</em><br />
A: I often get this question from people contemplating their next computer purchase. The fact of the matter is that you will almost always get more for your money performance-wise from a desktop. You will pay a premium for the mobility of a laptop. However, the answer to whether you should buy a laptop simply comes down to answering one question: do you need the mobility of a laptop?</p>

<p>While you will pay a premium for a laptop, the reality is that the difference in performance between a laptop and a desktop may be not appreciable for average use. Obviously, power-users who need the most performance out of a computer should opt for a desktop. But for the average user, most laptops of today will provide plenty of power. So if a user needs to use a computer away from their desk, then the obvious choice is a laptop.</p>

<p>It used to be that laptop users needed laptops because they needed a computer when away from their office or home. However, wireless technology has freed people from being tied to their desk and users are taking advantage by having their computers more accessible. It's no surprise that laptop sales are growing much faster than desktop sales. Many laptops are being sold because users want to use them anywhere in their home or office, not just when on the road.</p>

<p>One reason NOT to get a laptop is if a user has limited desk space. I often have users tell me they want a laptop because they don't want a big computer on their desk. If this is the ONLY reason a user wants a laptop (and not for mobility), then they should consider an all-in-one machine such as an iMac. The flat-panel design of today's iMac do not take a lot of desk space, and as mentioned above, you will get more for your money.</p>

<p>Another common situation I run into is where a user thinks they need both a laptop and desktop. They want the larger screen along with external keyboard and mouse when at a desk. I strongly recommend AGAINST doing this. The primary reason is that keeping data synchronized between two computers quickly becomes a big hassle. Unless a user has strong computer skills, switching between computers and keeping data consistent between them can be overwhelming. The second reason not to do this is that it is usually cheaper to buy a laptop and docking setup with external monitor, keyboard, and mouse. This way, a user can use their laptop on the road and still feel like they are using a desktop at their desk, keeping their data safely on one computer.</p>

<p>As usual, <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">please submit any technology questions you may have</a> and your question may be featured in this newsletter! <br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/08/q_should_i_buy_a_laptop_or_des.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/08/q_should_i_buy_a_laptop_or_des.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Q &amp; A</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:55:19 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Can Your Computer Ruin Your Life?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Marcel Brown" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/Marcel%20color%20-%20small.png" width="115" height="144" ALIGN=LEFT HSPACE=10 VSPACE=5>Is it possible for your computer to ruin your life? Apparently so. I recently read an article describing a situation where in fact this did happen. A man's work laptop was discovered to have pornographic material. He claimed he had no idea the material was on the computer. He was fired and had criminal charges brought against him. It was later proven that the computer given to him by his employer was not properly protected and all the material was downloaded to his computer by spyware. Charges were dropped and he is now suing his employer. But the damage was done as his reputation has been ruined.</p>

<p>You should take a moment to read the article, titled "<a href="http://www.efluxmedia.com/news_Malware_Destroyed_a_Mans_Life_19102.html">Malware Destroyed a Man's Life</a>". </p>

<p>I've noticed that malware has become increasingly stubborn and efficient lately. Windows computers without the latest virus and spyware protection are very susceptible to being compromised. If you are not sure of the status of your protection, do yourself a favor and have your computer checked for spyware and viruses. Make sure that your malware protection is recent and up-to-date. Do not let you or your family be vulnerable to malicious software when it could be easily prevented. Or if you own a business, you are putting yourself at risk if you don't protect the computers your employees use.</p>

<p>Let the story about this poor man's plight serve as a wake up call. Computers and technology are a far too critical part of our lives and businesses to take them for granted anymore. If you aren't having preventative maintenance done to your or your company's computers, you are setting yourself up for major problems.</p>

<p>Contact <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">Marcel</a> if you have any questions about malware or computer maintenance.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/08/can_your_computer_ruin_your_li.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/08/can_your_computer_ruin_your_li.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tech Tips</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:49:38 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>July 2008 FYI - Thewebsiteisdown.com</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Just a small word of warning, the web site I refer to in this article is not exactly kid friendly or not for you if you are easily offended.</p>

<p>If you've ever worked in IT, worked for a large company with an IT help desk, or know some IT geeks, check out the web site <a href="http://thewebsiteisdown.com">http://thewebsiteisdown.com</a>. It is a funny parody on the day-to-day life of a not-so-enthusiastic IT help desk guy.</p>

<p>What is really funny is that as I write this, the web site is, in fact, actually down!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/07/july_2008_fyi_thewebsiteisdown.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/07/july_2008_fyi_thewebsiteisdown.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FYI</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:41:38 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Tech Toy of the Month: iPhone/iPod Touch 2.0 Software</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="iphone3g.jpg" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/iphone3g.jpg" ALIGN=LEFT width="135" height="163" />Most people are aware that Apple has just released the iPhone 3G (which incidentally, the 3G refers to the third generation cellular network, not a 3rd generation iPhone). Of course, the iPhone 3G has many new features. There are many articles out there that review all these new features so I won't go over those. Instead, I'd like to focus on something that many people don't realize. Many of the new features of the iPhone 3G are also available as an upgrade to existing iPhones and the iPod Touch.</p>

<p>The reason many of the features of the iPhone 3G are available to existing iPhones and the iPod Touch is that Apple upgraded the operating system that is common to all these devices to coincide with the iPhone 3G release. You can read about the upgrade at this link <a href="http://www.apple.com/iphone/softwareupdate/">http://www.apple.com/iphone/softwareupdate/</a>. Some of the minor features that the 2.0 upgrade include improvements to the e-mail, calendar, and contacts programs. More significant features include support for enterprise services and protocols, which will increase adoption of the iPhone in the corporate environment. But the biggest feature by far is the ability for 3rd party developers to create applications for the iPhone and iPod Touch.</p>

<p>It is quite difficult to explain how the features of the iPhone and iPod Touch create an application environment that is unlike anything seen on any handheld device, or really any computer for that matter. In using many of the free applications available at this time, it is almost like the last year of the iPhone and iPod Touch was simply a teaser, giving us only a fraction of the potential of these devices. The new wave of applications is unearthing a wealth of potential new uses for these devices. Let me just say that these devices will not only make users of other handheld devices jealous, but they may also make users of gaming handhelds jealous as well. For a phone to be able to support the playing of games graphic and feature-rich enough to compete with handheld gaming devices says a lot about the power of the platform.</p>

<p>Earlier this year I predicted that the Apple TV would be the Tech Toy of the Year. However, now with the release of the iPhone/iPod Touch 2.0 software, I am reconsidering that prediction. One million iPhone 3G devices were sold in the first weekend of their release. It took 74 days to sell one million of the original iPhone. Once people start to see the applications that are running on the devices with the 2.0 software there will be even greater demand.</p>

<p>So if you have an older iPhone or iPod Touch, make sure you get the new update and see for yourself the new applications now available. And if you have any questions regarding the iPhone or iPod Touch, <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">please let me know</a>!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/07/tech_toy_of_the_month_iphoneip.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/07/tech_toy_of_the_month_iphoneip.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tech Toys</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:42:22 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Q: Why should I spend any money fixing my old computer when I can buy a new one for $500?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Tech Q & A" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/Question%20Mark.JPG" width="100" height="91" ALIGN=LEFT HSPACE=10 VSPACE=5/><br />
<em>- Submitted by many<br />
</em><br />
A: It is true that you can buy a computer for around $500 or even less. This certainly seems like a good deal. For that price, it would seem that spending any money on repairs or maintenance of an old computer would be wasteful. And it is true that in some cases it does not make sense to spend money on an old computer. But there are several things that people do not consider that can make a strong case for keeping up an old computer.</p>

<p>Not all computers are created equal. Most of the time, very low-cost computers are underpowered, lack adequate RAM, or are built from low quality parts. An underpowered computer can provide a very frustrating user experience. This is especially true when considering Windows Vista. Additionally, those who have kids that play 3D games must be careful not to purchase a computer with a less powerful video card that what is already in their computer. The video card is often more important to the performance of 3D games than the processor. The bottom line is that just because a computer is new, does not necessarily mean that it will be a lot faster that the computer you have now.</p>

<p>Many people forget that the initial purchase price of a computer is only part of its total cost of ownership. The less expensive the computer, the higher the probability of hardware problems. Also, the more likely that it will require upgrades sooner. And one must consider what kind of monitor, if any, comes with a low-cost PC. Old monitors need replacing as well. So the seemingly low cost of a computer may be a lot more than at first glance.</p>

<p>Finally, many people do not consider the time and potential expense of transferring their data, software, and existing peripherals to a new computer. It can be technically challenging for average users to successfully transfer their data and software to a new computer. And again, when considering Windows Vista, older peripherals may not work very well. So many users who purchase new computers must pay a computer technician to setup the new computer, transfer their data and software, and setup their peripherals.</p>

<p>So to sum up, low-cost computers generally end up costing a lot more than their sticker price when considering total cost of ownership and additional services required. As well, poorly made computers can become frustrating experiences for owners. Given these considerations, it can often make sense to fix up an existing computer to get a few more years of useful service out of them.</p>

<p>As usual, <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">please submit any technology questions you may have</a> and your question may be featured in this newsletter! </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/07/q_why_should_i_spend_any_money.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/07/q_why_should_i_spend_any_money.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Q &amp; A</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:34:40 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Save Money! - Squeeze More Life Out of Your Computer</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Marcel Brown" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/Marcel%20color%20-%20small.png" width="115" height="144" ALIGN=LEFT HSPACE=10 VSPACE=5>As many people are looking for ways to save money, they may be putting off the purchase of a new computer. Other people would like to get a new computer and pass along their current computer to their kids. Either way, many people would like to keep their current computers running a few years longer. The problem is their computer may be working quite slowly or experiencing other problems. Often people think they must purchase a new PC when their older computer reaches a certain age or starts experiencing problems. The reality is that many older computers, with a few minor upgrades and some minor maintenance, can be spruced up to work well again and last a few more years.</p>

<p>The first item that can greatly improve an older computer's performance is additional RAM. Without getting too "techy", the bare minimum I recommend for most computers (Mac or PC) is 512 MB of RAM. Less than this and I guarantee your computer is not running at maximum efficiency. Even 512 MB of RAM is on the borderline, so I really recommend at least 1 GB for average users, 2 GB if you are more of a "power user". If your computer runs Windows Vista, you may even want to consider 3 or 4 GB of RAM. With a few exceptions, RAM is really not very expensive anymore, so I highly recommend you consider this upgrade.</p>

<p>The next item to consider if you'd like your computer to last a few more years is a hard drive replacement. As it is one of the few moving parts in a computer, your hard drive is the part most likely to fail. Unfortunately, this is also the part that contains all your data and software, so it is potentially the most catastrophic and traumatizing problem to encounter! Unless you have a full system backup, recovering from a hard drive crash can be expensive and very time-consuming. In my experience, hard drives begin to fail after about 3 to 5 years of normal use. So the smart thing to do is replace the hard drive BEFORE it fails, preserving your data and software settings. Additionally, you will usually get a much bigger and often faster hard drive than your old one.</p>

<p>Finally, most people neglect the general maintenance and upkeep of their computers. Others "overprotect" their computers with cumbersome and intrusive utilities that really do nothing except hamper their computer's performance. Imagine if you did nothing to maintain your car. It would eventually begin to perform poorly, eventually completely giving out. Similarly, neglected computers don't perform their best and oftentimes may fail sooner than they would have if properly maintained. While it is possible for people to perform maintenance tasks themselves, the reason most people don't do them is they don't have the time or inclination to do so. For this reason, I recommend that people let a technology professional perform the routine maintenance on their computers. Most qualified technology service companies will have some sort of routine maintenance plan available.</p>

<p>Of course, I provide these services as well. I recommend starting with my Computer Tune-Up, which provides the general maintenance tasks your computer needs, along with providing you an assessment of what your computer needs to perform at its best.</p>

<p>If you have any questions regarding this article, please <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">let me know</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/07/save_money_squeeze_more_life_o.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/07/save_money_squeeze_more_life_o.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tech Tips</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:32:17 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>June 2008 FYI - IT Workers Getting Fatter</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>A recent study shows that <a href="http://entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/05/20/211233">34 percent of IT workers have gained more than ten pounds</a> in their current jobs. When I read this article, it really wasn't surprising to me. Back when I worked as a contractor, my contracting rep picked me up for lunch in a new Cadillac. I asked him why he got a new car, and he said that he had to get a bigger car because most of the guys that worked for him couldn't fit in his old two-seater Mazda! </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/06/june_2008_fyi_it_workers_getti.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/06/june_2008_fyi_it_workers_getti.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FYI</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 22:46:42 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Tech Toy of the Month: iRobot Roomba</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="roomba.gif" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/roomba.gif" ALIGN=LEFT HSPACE=10 width="183" height="152" />One of the more simple chores that most of us put off doing is vacuuming our floors. Especially for those who have carpets that easily show dirt or crumbs, vacuuming can seem like a never-ending job. Wouldn't it be great if we could just have a little robot zip around our floor when we're not there and clean up for us? Apparently so, because one company has a whole line of little robots that vacuum our floors for us.</p>

<p>The Roomba, from a company called <a href="http://www.iRobot.com">iRobot</a>, is a line of small robot vacuum cleaners. The original Roomba product was introduced in 2002. So this Tech Toy has been around for many years, but it still is not very well known among the average consumer. I'm writing about it because I recently noticed that the company has expanded their product line to include robots that handle all sorts of menial tasks. So it would seem that this company and their products have been very successful.</p>

<p>But I'm going to focus on the Roomba products for this article. Now on their 3rd generation of robotic vacuum cleaners, the Roomba basically works by periodically navigating your floor area, cleaning as it goes. It uses various sensors to avoid stairs, drop-offs, and areas you deem as off-limits. It is small enough to travel under furniture, clean into corners, and along walls. It automatically adjusts for hard floors or carpets, and also is smart enough to determine how dirty an area is and spend extra time on spots that need additional cleaning. <a href="http://www.irobot.com/sp.cfm?pageid=335">Click here</a> for a more detailed video showing how the Roomba works.</p>

<p>When not in use, the Roomba finds it's "home", which is where the Roomba recharges itself when not working. The newer Roomba models can run on a schedule, so you can set it to run when you're not at home, or if you don't mind, while you are sleeping. Since the Roomba runs more often than we humans tend to vacuum our floors, it tends to keep messes from building up, which should give your floor an overall cleaner look most of the time.</p>

<p>As I mentioned, the iRobot company now has a whole line of cleaning robots. One is even designed to clean swimming pools! So if you'd like a little help keeping your home clean, check out the iRobot line of products.</p>

<p>If you have come across an interesting device or emerging technology, <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">please let me know</a> and I may include it in a future newsletter.<br />
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/06/tech_toy_of_the_month_irobot_r.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/06/tech_toy_of_the_month_irobot_r.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tech Toys</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:57:17 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Q: When should I replace the battery in my battery backup unit?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Tech Q & A" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/Question%20Mark.JPG" width="100" height="91" ALIGN=LEFT HSPACE=10 VSPACE=5/><br />
<em>- Submitted by Darell Newman, <a href="http://www.personalpreferenceservices.com">Personal Preference Landscape Care</a><br />
</em><br />
A: The batteries in most battery backup units last between 3 - 5 years. In fact, some companies have their battery backup software warn users that the battery in their unit is over 3 years old. Given this information, obviously most people would think they need to replace their battery in about 3 to 4 years. However, my recommendation in most cases is actually for users not to replace the battery in battery backup units. Let me explain why.</p>

<p>The first reason is cost. Simply speaking, the cost of replacing a battery in a battery backup unit is almost always nearly the same price as just buying a new unit. Even if you are spending a little more for a brand new unit, the pace of technology improvements in the course of 3 - 5 years means that you will be getting a better overall unit by buying a new one.</p>

<p>Second, the purpose of a battery backup or surge protector is to absorb power problems so your computer doesn't. Over time, these devices can be damaged or wear out. It would be a shame to spend money on a new battery only to have the unit fail soon after.</p>

<p>Finally, some batteries can be difficult to find replacements for and difficult to physically replace. Any savings in getting a new battery will probably be lost in the time involved finding a matching battery and then actually installing it.</p>

<p>So basically, the answer to when to replace your battery is never! Generally, no harm comes if the battery stops working (but be sure to replace it right away), so you can wait until the battery backup indicates that it is time to replace your battery and simply buy a new one. If you want to be proactive, wait about 4 years to purchase a new unit.</p>

<p>As usual, <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">please submit any technology questions you may have</a> and your question may be featured in this newsletter! </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/06/q_when_should_i_replace_the_ba.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/06/q_when_should_i_replace_the_ba.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Q &amp; A</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:49:43 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Content Filtering Made Easy</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Marcel Brown" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/Marcel%20color%20-%20small.png" width="115" height="144" ALIGN=LEFT HSPACE=10 VSPACE=5>One of the more common concerns I hear from both parents and employers is how they can keep questionable content off the computer of their kids and employees. The most common way to do this is by the use of a content filtering system. The problem with content filtering systems are that they are generally difficult to implement, difficult to manage, and often costly. However, within the last year, a new content filtering service has become available that is relatively simple to implement, nearly no work to manage, and is completely free!</p>

<p>The service is called <a href="http://www.OpenDNS.com">OpenDNS</a>. Once configured, the service can content filter an entire network or a single computer. It can filter out over 30 categories of content, such as adult, gambling, phishing, and weapon sites. Setting up OpenDNS utilizes the existing domain name system that is part of every computer so it does not require any software to be installed. Since the content lists are maintained by OpenDNS, you do not need to download updates or otherwise perform any maintenance yourself.</p>

<p>I've set up this service for several of my clients and use it in my own store. So far it has lived up to its promise. As simple as the service is to describe and setup, it really does appear to be as powerful as it claims. The reason that OpenDNS is free to use is because they generate revenue by displaying ads when a user types an incorrect address or hits a site that is blocked by the content filter. At first this sounds somewhat concerning, but I've observed this in practice and in my opinion, it is very unintrusive.</p>

<p>Now be aware that content filtering using OpenDNS is not infallible. A technically savvy user could easily figure out how to work around OpenDNS if a computer's settings are not locked down. There are ways to prevent savvy users from getting around OpenDNS, but be aware that those methods involve additional work or cost. These measures may certainly be worth the cost, and some computers may already be locked down, but I simply want to make people aware of the limitations.</p>

<p>If you are interested in content filtering one computer, a few computers, or a whole network of computers, <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">please let me know</a>. We can discuss OpenDNS and other content filtering systems to make sure you find a system that works best for your situation.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/06/content_filtering_made_easy.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/06/content_filtering_made_easy.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tech Tips</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 21:45:38 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>May 2008 FYI: Dell Goofs Big Time!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/dell_goofs.jpg" target=_blank> <img src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/dell_goofs_sm.jpg" ALIGN=LEFT HSPACE=10 VSPACE=5 width="153" height="62" /></a>It seems Dell had a bit of a quality control issue for certain laptops in Europe, Africa, and the Middle East. Click on the picture to the left for a larger view and notice the lower left corner where the Z key normally is.</p>

<p><a href="http://direct2dell.com/smallbusiness/archive/2008/05/08/europe-vostro-keyboard-issue-what-we-re-doing.aspx">At least Dell is trying to make good on this.</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/05/may_2008_fyi_dell_goofs_big_ti.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/05/may_2008_fyi_dell_goofs_big_ti.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">FYI</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:11:44 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Tech Toy of the Month: Belkin Wireless USB Hub</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="belkin_wusb.jpg" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/belkin_wusb.jpg" ALIGN=LEFT width="250" height="250" />Over the course of the last 10 years, the Universal Serial Bus, otherwise known as USB, has changed the way we use computers for the better. Instead of several different types of ports, USB has become the standard for connecting nearly every type of computer peripheral available. Everything from keyboards to flash drives to printers to digital cameras can be connected via USB. USB is hot-pluggable, which means devices can be plugged in or removed without the need to reboot or without causing any damage, as was the case with older port technologies. The ease of USB has caused the <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9011006">proliferation of many types of USB devices, such as toy kittens and beverage chillers!</a> With all the types of devices that users can plug into their computer, this has also caused the potential for a rats nest of cables. Fortunately, a technology that has been quietly developing for a few years should be soon coming to fruition.</p>

<p>Wireless USB, as the name implies, is USB without wires. Ultimately, the plan is that devices and computers will be created with wireless USB built-in. This will allow for truly wireless USB devices. Users will be able to bring a wireless USB peripheral within range of their computer with wireless USB and "connect" it to their computer just as easily as they do today with a wired USB device.</p>

<p>However, at this time few truly wireless USB devices exist. In the interim manufacturers are creating wireless USB hubs that allow today's wired USB devices to be connected wirelessly to a computer. One good example I found is the simply named <a href="http://catalog.belkin.com/IWCatProductPage.process?Product_Id=377793">Wireless USB Hub from Belkin</a>. While certainly not for everyone, for those users who have a lot of USB devices and could benefit from placing some devices away from their computer, wireless USB hubs like these could be very useful. By moving some devices away from the computer, users reduce the amount of cables connected directly to their computer, helping simplify cable management. It may also increase the amount of usable desk space for some users.</p>

<p>Unfortunately, at this time the Belkin Wireless USB Hub only works with Windows. Mac drivers are in the works and other companies are also working on wireless USB hubs that will work with the Macintosh. Additionally, reviews of the Belkin device show that while performance is generally overall very good, the further the device is moved from the computer, the worse the performance becomes. Therefore, for devices that require higher speed, such as USB hard drives or flash drives, using them wirelessly may not be the best option. Finally, the list price of the Belkin device is currently $199, which seems a bit pricey. But as all technology tends to do, this price will probably come down fairly quickly.</p>

<p>So if you're someone who has a mess of USB devices at their desk, look into the Belkin Wireless USB Hub. It may help you make some room on your desk for those <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/electronic/85b6/">USB cup warmers</a> or <a href="http://www.thinkgeek.com/geektoys/warfare/8bc4/]">toy missile launchers</a>!</p>

<p>If you have come across an interesting device or emerging technology, <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">please let me know</a> and I may include it in a future newsletter.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/05/tech_toy_of_the_month_belkin_w.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/05/tech_toy_of_the_month_belkin_w.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Tech Toys</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:03:29 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Q: I hear that Microsoft is going to &quot;kill&quot; Windows XP this summer. My computer has Windows XP. Is this something I should be concerned about?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Tech Q & A" src="http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/Question%20Mark.JPG" width="100" height="91" ALIGN=LEFT HSPACE=10 VSPACE=5/><br />
<em>- Submitted by many</a><br />
</em><br />
A: It's funny how many variations of this question exist. Yes, Microsoft says they will stop shipping Windows XP after June 30th. Some people think that this means that Microsoft will no longer provide support for XP. Others think they will be forced to upgrade to Vista this summer or their computer will stop working. But most people have only heard little bits of this story and basically have no idea what to think. So let me set the story straight for you.</p>

<p>Microsoft says they will stop shipping Windows XP after June 30th. They could still change their mind, as there are many grassroots efforts trying to convince Microsoft otherwise. But let's assume Microsoft will stick to their guns. What this means is that Microsoft will not ship XP to the distribution channel (wholesalers) or directly to customers. However, any copies of XP that are in stock in distribution or retail will still be available for purchase as long as that stock is available. Many distributors and retailers are planning on stockpiling copies of XP, so it could be very likely that Windows XP will be available for sale long after June 30th. And there are some loopholes for "system builders", small companies who build computers for resale where they can continue to buy Windows XP through the end of the year. There are also other loopholes that apply mostly to businesses which I won't go into here.</p>

<p>So June 30th may be the beginning of the end of Windows XP, but certainly nothing dramatic will happen on that date. Your computer with Windows XP WILL continue to work. You will NOT be forced to upgrade to Vista. Microsoft will simply stop shipping new Windows XP copies. Buying a new PC with Windows XP may become a little more challenging after June 30th, but it will still be possible.</p>

<p>Also, just because Microsoft will stop shipping Windows XP does not mean they are ending support for XP. Microsoft will continue to provide "mainstream" support for XP until April 2009. Then they will continue to provide "extended" support through April 2014. However, most people don't get support directly from Microsoft anyway, so this is largely irrelevant. What is important is whether or not Microsoft will continue to release bug fixes and security patches. Microsoft's plan is to continue to provide security updates through April of 2014. As far as "bug fixes", that is left up to Microsoft's discretion whether they will release fixes to the public after April of 2009. But some experts believe that because Service Pack 3 for Windows XP was just released very recently, that Microsoft may extend the timeframe in which they will continue to release bug fixes for XP with SP 3.</p>

<p>So bottom line is don't worry ... be happy! June 30th will pass us by and you and your computer will be no worse for the wear. As usual, <a href="mailto:marcel@marcelbrown.com">please submit any technology questions you may have to me</a> and your question may be featured in this newsletter! </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/05/q_i_hear_that_microsoft_is_goi.html</link>
         <guid>http://blog.marcelbrown.com/techbytes/2008/05/q_i_hear_that_microsoft_is_goi.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Q &amp; A</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:00:02 -0600</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
